By Guillermo Benavides
Beijing, Sep 9 (EFE).- Seventy-five years after Chinese troops entered Lhasa, the battle over Tibet’s history has expanded beyond textbooks and monuments into artificial intelligence, with Chinese AI models largely reproducing Beijing’s official account while refusing or restricting responses to politically sensitive questions.
On Sep. 9, 1951, the People’s Liberation Army entered Lhasa, marking the beginning of Chinese rule over Tibet. Since then, Beijing and the Tibetan government-in-exile have promoted fundamentally irreconcilable narratives about what that moment represented.
China celebrates what it calls the «peaceful liberation» of Tibet as the beginning of economic development and the end of a feudal system.
Tibetan exiles and many critics argue that Beijing consolidated its control through military coercion and has since tightened political, religious, linguistic, and cultural restrictions.
Today, that struggle over historical memory has entered a new arena: artificial intelligence.
Two versions of 1951
The turning point came in October 1950, when the People’s Liberation Army defeated Tibetan forces in Chamdo.
The following May, a Tibetan delegation signed a 17-point agreement in Beijing, recognizing Tibet as part of China in exchange for promises to preserve its political system, the Dalai Lama’s status, and religious freedom.
China presents the agreement as a negotiated settlement underpinning Tibet’s peaceful incorporation into the People’s Republic.
The Tibetan government-in-exile argues that its delegates lacked authority and signed the document under duress.
On Sep. 9, 1951, PLA troops entered Lhasa without fighting. Although a telegram issued in the Dalai Lama’s name later endorsed the agreement, he repudiated it after fleeing to India during the 1959 uprising.
Development and tighter control
Beijing points to dramatic economic and infrastructure growth as evidence of the benefits of its rule.
Official figures show Tibet’s economy reached 303.2 billion yuan (about $45.2 billion) in 2025, while the region’s railway network expanded from 701 km in 2012 to 1,359 km by the end of 2024.
Chinese authorities say modern transport has ended isolation and lifted the region out of poverty.
Critics contend that modernization has been accompanied by growing efforts to assimilate Tibetan identity.
In 2025, Tibetan ceased to be a compulsory subject in China’s university entrance examination, a move exile groups say weakens the language’s long-term status despite its continued teaching in schools.
Earlier, UN experts raised concerns that around one million Tibetan children were attending boarding schools away from their families and linguistic communities, allegations Beijing rejects, citing the challenges of educating children across sparsely populated areas.
Religious life has also become a point of contention, with China insisting that Tibetan Buddhism must adapt to socialist society and asserting its authority to approve the future reincarnation of the Dalai Lama.
AI enters the narrative battle
EFE asked several leading Chinese AI models, including DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi and Ernie, about Tibet’s incorporation into China using both official terminology and alternative formulations such as «invasion,» «annexation» and «military coercion.»
When prompted with official language, the models overwhelmingly echoed Beijing’s account of «peaceful liberation,» national reunification and the abolition of feudalism.
When the wording shifted, their responses changed.
Ernie described terms such as «invasion» and «annexation» as «completely wrong» and rejected claims of coercion.
DeepSeek acknowledged that the Dalai Lama later disputed the agreement but ultimately redirected its answer toward the official narrative.
A similar pattern emerged with DeepZang, an AI platform launched by China as a tool for preserving the Tibetan language.
Asked about the «peaceful liberation,» DeepZang reproduced the official Chinese version, portraying the 17-point agreement as a legitimate affirmation of Beijing’s sovereignty that ended serfdom and brought social progress.
When questioned about invasion, Tibetan resistance or military pressure, the system classified the topic as sensitive and declined to answer.
Seventy-five years after troops entered Lhasa, the contest over Tibet’s history is no longer confined to archives or political speeches.
It is increasingly embedded in the algorithms of the country’s rapidly expanding AI systems. EFE
gbm-sk
